THIS ARTICLE/PRESS RELEASE IS PAID FOR AND PRESENTED BY NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology - read more
Snow-repelling solar cell panels could boost generation in Norway
Norway has seen an increase in solar power capacity in recent years. However, in witner, solar panels face a big problem: snow.
Norway has been slow to exploit solar energy, but over the last few years interest in the technology has been rapidly increasing. Between 2015 and 2021, the country saw a 15-fold increase in its capacity for solar power generation.
“It’s a classical misunderstanding that there is not enough solar radiation in Norway,” Bjørn Petter Jelle says.
He is a professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at NTNU.
“In one way, it’s partly true. We don’t have so much sun in the darkest winter months. But on the other hand, the sun we do have in winter is very valuable, in addition to the midnight sun or sunshine large parts of the night during summer, of course,” he says.
There is one significant challenge to overcome, however. Snow on solar cells can reduce the amount of electricity they generate at the time of year when it is needed the most.
“A thin layer of snow, and you have no electricity production,” Jelle says.
Complex problem
Preventing snow and ice from sticking to a solar panel is a more complex problem than it might first appear.
Depending on many variables and their interactions, snow may at times easily slide off and at other times stick to the solar cell panel surfaces.
To understand the impact of the snow problem on Norway’s solar power generation, Jelle and colleagues at NTNU and SINTEF modelled how much extra electricity could be generated in three Norwegian cities if solar cells featured icephobic surfaces or coatings that reduced the amount of snow accumulating on panels.
The term icephobic refers to a substance or material's ability to repel or resist the formation of ice, as well as preventing the ice from sticking to it.
Simulated icephobic surfaces
Using NTNU’s ZEB Living Lab in Trondheim as their case study, Jelle and colleagues estimated how much solar radiation would reach the surface of the building’s solar cells throughout the winter months – and how much solar electricity would have been lost due to snow coverage over the last four years.
Then, using data on the efficiency of icephobic coatings available commercially for other applications, the researchers simulated how much of the electricity lost due to snow coverage could be recovered if those solar panels had had an icephobic surface.
The researchers then repeated the same analysis for two other cities, Oslo and Bergen, using local climate and latitude data.
They found that icephobic coatings could reduce the amount of electricity lost over the winter months by 65 per cent in Oslo, 60 per cent in Trondheim, and 45 per cent in Bergen.
Most effective between January and April
The research also showed that the coatings would be most effective between January and April, rather than November and December, at all three locations.
This makes sense when you consider the difference in the amount of solar radiation over those months, Jelle notes.
In Trondheim, the city at the highest latitude in the study, there are approximately four to five hours of daylight during the dark months of December and January.
“Then as you get into February and March, you get more and more sun,” Jelle says.
That extra solar radiation would also start to melt snow that’s accumulated on a solar panel, thus giving an icephobic coating a helping hand.
Reference:
Manni et al. The influence of icephobic nanomaterial coatings on solar cell panels at high latitudes, Solar Energy, vol. 248, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2022.11.005
Read more content from NTNU:
-
Artificial nose can sniff out damaged fruit and spoiled meat
-
Want to be the best? It’s all in your mindset
-
Millions of Earth's species remain unknown to us. Can we still identify them?
-
AI expert: We should not have AI that exploits people's weaknesses
-
Afghanistan veterans are more prone to anger
-
Could a digital driving instructor offer the same quality as a human, but at a lower cost?
