THIS CONTENT IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY SINTEF - read more

How fish farm nets are cleaned affects how much microplastic is released into the ocean

The fishing and aquaculture industries are major consumers of plastic. But research shows that simple methods can reduce emissions.

Electric underwater robot cleaning a fish farm cage net and stirring up debris.
This electric robot is reasonably light on its feet as it meanders back and forth to clean the cage net.
Published

Rough seas and aggressive net cleaning can lead to more microplastics in the ocean. 

Researchers have therefore been investigating how to reduce these emissions by choosing better materials and methods for cleaning fish farming nets.

“Microplastic emissions are the result of complex interactions between material choices, a rope’s usage history, and cleaning methods,” says Andy Booth, chief scientist at SINTEF Ocean.

He leads the research project. Tests from the project show that some recycled ropes and nylon nets – both coated and uncoated – seem to release more microplastics than other rope types.

Net cleaning method plays a role

Farming nets are often affected by fouling, which is the accumulation of unwanted materials such as microorganisms and algae. This means they need to be cleaned regularly. 

Researchers therefore tested several cleaning methods.

Using a cleaning robot proved gentler than traditional net washing and cavitation washing – a water jet that forms tiny bubbles that implode. The tests showed that robot brushing caused less damage and more even wear on the coating.

Graph with images of three ropes to the right.
The blue coating was harder hit by net washing and cavitation washing (a and b). When using a cleaning robot, a thin coating remained, but the rope was much less damaged (c)

“The nets are exposed to what we call mechanical stress that can cause them to shrink or wear. So cleaning them actually contributes to accelerating the release of microplastics,” says Booth.

He adds that microplastics are released as nets wear out and break down over time.

“Plastic not only contributes to environmental pollution, but it can also contaminate seafood products,” he says.

Nets are often coated with wax, resin, or acrylic-based products to protect against UV damage, support cleaning-in-place (CIP), and reduce wear and tear.

The researchers fond that used nets released more microplastics than new ones, especially in high-wear areas. These are typically just below the water surface and on the sea floor.

Woman in blue lab coat holding up a round filter
Stefania Piarulli is part of the research team. Here she shows a filter that was used to capture microplastics in the project.

A good start and solid basis for a new standard

Collecting samples at sea cages has been challenging, but lab tests clearly show differences between nets made from different materials. 

However, these tests do not fully reflect real environmental conditions or typical cleaning processes.

“When we tried to conduct field studies, the data basis became much less clear due to the complex test conditions,” says Booth.

Workers inspecting a large aquaculture net in a workshop.
ScaleAQ manufactures equipment for the aquaculture industry at their premises on the island of Frøya. They are already applying the results from the project that they have been a part of when making new purchases.

Still, the emissions data and project reports provide a solid basis for developing a new industry standard.

Booth says that most of the tested solutions arlearly exist, so the aquaculture industry can use them now by applying the project's findings in how they buy and maintain equipment to reduce microplastic emissions

About the project

SMARTER: SINTEF, NORCE Research, NCE Aquatec Cluster, ScaleAQ, Watbots, and Brynsløkken have tested how nets and ropes made of different materials release microplastics and studied how different cleaning techniques affect emissions.

The project is funded by the Norwegian Seafood Research Fund (FHF).

Powered by Labrador CMS