An article from KILDEN Information and News About Gender Research in Norway
How to measure gender equality?
A Norwegian recipe for measuring gender equality is now used in 16 countries.
KILDEN Information and News About Gender Research in Norway
How do you measure whether or not a country is gender equal? How can we tell if men and women are equal?
Is it sufficient to measure wage level, and who spends more time on housework and childcare? And who is exposed to violence from whom? Is it important to know how many women there are in parliament, how many female professors there are in the universities or how many male nurses?
Eight years ago, in 2007, an interdisciplinary Norwegian research group tried to answer these questions in the best way possible. Since then their results have drawn international attention.
“Our survey has become an international success with a distribution which is rare within research. It is extremely exiting to be part of this,” says Øystein Gullvåg Holter, Professor at Centre for Gender Research (STK) at the University of Oslo.
Statistics and survey
Generally, we talk about two primary methods for measuring the degree of gender equality in an area or a country.
The first model considers overarching objectives and statistics. One may for instance compare the percentage of working women in one country with the percentage of working women in another country.
One of the most well-known examples is Global Gender Gap Index, which is published every year by World Economic Forum (WEF). It measures the relative differences between men and women in countries all over the world on four main areas: health, education, economy, and political participation.
The other main method for measuring equality is through surveys, usually where questions related to gender equality are formulated as supplements to questions related to other topics. A well-known survey including gender issues is Gender and Generation, which takes a close look at the connection between gender and generations. Gender is included in the survey, but gender equality is not the primary focus.
Nearly 300 variables
Several models for measuring gender equality
- In Norway, Statistics Norway (SSB) measure gender equality in the municipalities by the use of their own index. The last survey was performed in 2013. It showed that all the municipalities except Øst-Agder, experienced an increased percentage of female leaders from the year before.
- World Economic Forum (WEF) publish their Global Gender Gap Report annually. They measure the relative difference between men and women in countries all over the world in relation to the four main areas health, education, economy, and political participation. According to the Gender Gap Report from 2014, Norway is the third best country in the world when it comes to gender equality, preceded by Iceland as number one and Finland in second place.
- The survey Generation and Gender looks at the relation between gender and age.
- The UN’s Gender Development Index (GDI) measure the gender gap when it comes to health, education, and access to financial resources. Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) seeks to measure inequality between the countries based on women’s relative income, participation in well-paid financially powerful positions, and access to professional and political positions.
When Holter and his colleagues Cathrine Egeland and Helge Svare from the Work Research Institute resolved to measure gender equality in 2007, they decided to create a model with the sole objective of measuring gender equality – nothing else. Additionally, they wanted both a clear male and female perspective.
“You may compare it to creating a new type of binoculars with higher resolution than what was available before. Indexes for the measurement of gender equality have a restricted variable set, usually 15 to 30, while our model has nearly 300 variables. These were selected and formulated in order to show gender in/equality in different areas and aspects” says Holter.
“Twenty years ago, many people considered gender equality to be something too soft and vague to measure. The development in this field has been enormous during the past years. Our method builds on index methods and on earlier survey methods, but goes further.”
Men’s perspective on gender equality
In the 2007 survey, the researchers found a positive correlation between men’s experience of life quality and gender equality.
“In general, gender equality has particularly positive effects for women, but we found that it also has positive effects for men. Men living in relatively gender equal relationships were happier in their relationships and experienced a higher quality of life than men who live in less gender equal relationships,” says Holter.
A recent study by Holter, in which he has studied 81 European countries and American states, shows that both men’s and women’s quality of life is higher in countries or states with a relatively high degree of gender equality, compared to those with a low degree of gender equality. And this find seems to stand also when controlled against other variables such as wage level and distribution.
“The ideal of the male main provider for the family may be perceived as a burden – more so now than a few decades ago,” Holter comments.
“Another tendency is that men who have been on parental leave are more satisfied with the contact they establish with their children. We also found that their spouses/partners were more satisfied with the relationship.”
The research model from 2007 consisted of three parts. The first part is a representative survey created in order to map attitudes, conditions, and behavior related to gender equality within different areas of society. The second part is a theoretical model in which the researchers have applied theoretical perspectives from various disciplines. The third part is a cross-disciplinary cooperation platform where different methods and qualitative sub-studies are used to help improve the survey and fill out the missing parts.
The survey is the most ground-breaking part of the research model, but according to Holter, it cannot be applied independently of the two other elements in the research model.
“The survey is developed in order to measure the core area gender equality,” he emphasises.
The 2007 project had a broad reference group involving participants from various gender research communities, professionals and practitioners.
“Many versions of the survey were submitted for comments, and the result was in many ways a collective Norwegian contribution,” he says.
The point of departure is gender equality. But Holter and his colleagues combine gender equality with many other topics and questions which haven’t previously been considered in context, since these data haven’t been accessible within the same set of data. For instance, they have examined time use surveys and employment surveys – how much time women and men spend on work, family, house work – together with questions related to power and conflict.
“How do you measure power relations within the family?”
“We look at who makes the decisions, for instance when it comes to purchasing a home, and who has the most resources such as income.”
While other surveys often are content with examining formal power such as the percentage of women in higher education or the amount of women in leadership positions, this survey also includes the private sphere, household and family, work life, friendship and participation and power related to decisions within the family.
Theory and practice
It is common to ask about people’s attitudes towards gender equality in gender equality surveys. Holter and his colleagues, however, have looked at both attitudes and practice.
“Our goal is to find out whether there is a correlation between practice and attitudes in various aspects of life,” says Holter.
A typical example is a married couple who both think housework responsibilities should be shared equally between them. Nevertheless, as it turns out, the wife does most of the work.
“Many were concerned with equal distribution, and what was new in 2007 was that more people actually put theory into practice. But we also found an underlying level, where the man still had the prime responsibility for the finances and the woman carries most of the responsibilities in the home.”
Violence and conflict
The Norwegian survey has been used as a template for the international survey International Men and Gender Equality Survey (IMAGES). This survey is either completed or under completion in 16 countries.
The IMAGES survey will be carried out in Moscow in Russia, a country in which no systematic survey on gender equality has been previously performed. The survey will also be carried out in several Arabic countries.
“IMAGES has a stronger focus on men than the 2007 survey, but it also has a clear feminist perspective, for instance when it comes to violence,” says Holter.
“Gender equality is properly measured in these countries for the first time, and the surveys offer much new information, both potentials and problems.”
Although these countries are already included in index based surveys such as Global Gender Gap Index, the new data offers new knowledge of variation within countries and trends across the world.
“Do the IMAGE surveys from other countries indicate that men benefit from gender equality there too?”
“Yes, it is a trend there too, but it is too early to tell. New data is constantly coming in, but not everything has been analyzed yet. But what we can tell for sure is that there is a clear correlation between low gender equality in the relationship and higher risk of violence and abuse.”
The IMAGES survey also focus on problems particularly related to the countries in which it is performed. Although people in all countries are asked questions about domestic violence, there is particular focus on questions concerning violence, sexuality, and conflict in countries such as India, Brazil, and Mexico.
The problem of rape in India
The IMAGES study was completed in India in 2011. The following year, in December 2012, a twenty-three year old female medical student was brutally raped by several men on a bus. She died of the injuries afterwards.
This case received massive attention both in India and internationally. Delhi was called the rape capital of the world. Many people thought the gang rape was no one-time exception, but rather a symptom of a negative culture in which violence and assault on women are accepted and tolerated.
The arguments presented by the activists received more approval since they were supported by studies confirming that rape is, as a matter of fact, a major problem in India. The IMAGES survey was one such study.
“The IMAGES survey made it clear that India is a serious problem area in terms of rape and violence against women. The percentage of men who responded “yes” to the statement “there are times when a woman deserves to be beaten”, is much higher in India than in any other country in which the survey has been carried out,” says Holter.
Research on gender equality in advanced studies
In May this year, a new, improved European version of the Norway 2007 model, developed by a Polish-Norwegian team, was tested through a survey in Poland.
“It has a 64 percent response rate, many signs of engagement, and very interesting new results”, Holter says. The Poland/Norway Gender equality and quality of life project (GEQ), supported by EEA grants, will include a test report and blueprint for a common European survey in 2016.
Based on these international and European experiences, Holter wants to develop a new and improved Norwegian survey which is better than the one from in 2007. He also calls for more experimental and theoretical research on gender equality, so-called advanced studies in academia.
“We’re trying to get funding for a survey of this kind. It would be ideal to run the survey in 2017, ten year after the first one,” says Holter.
Translated by: Cathinka Dahl Hambro